Best Tempo alternative for time tracking and resource planning in Jira

Disclaimer: This post is written by the Planyway team, so it might come off as biased and one-sided. Well, we hope it doesn’t. We did our best to weigh the pros and cons of our plugin as an alternative to Tempo Timesheets and Tempo Planner and to present an honest review based on the actual features, pricing, real use cases, and customer feedback published on Atlassian Marketplace, Capterra, and other review platforms.

Somewhere down the road of using Tempo Timesheets and Tempo Planner, some users might start noticing that those plugins no longer suffice for their needs. For some, it might be the pricing. Others grow tired of interface complexity and plugin-stacking. Whatever it is, there usually comes a point when a tool that once felt “good enough” starts creating friction. In this article, we’ll look at why that happens and what alternatives are there to consider.

TL;DR

• Planyway is an all-in-one tool for project planning, resource management, and time tracking with a focus on visual ease. It’s great for those who want to avoid complexity and reduce costs, as all the features are bundled into one reasonably priced package. There’s also a free plan for teams of up to 10 users.
• Tempo Timesheets is best for detailed time tracking, especially in large teams that request business-oriented analytics. However, to get a complete set of key features (such as planning, budgeting, and advanced reporting), you’ll need to purchase additional Tempo plugins.
• Tempo Planner is a feature-rich resource management tool well-integrated with Tempo Timesheets, but without Timesheets data, its forecasting abilities are quite limited.

#1 Time tracking

We divided our comparison into several parts for a reason. As you may know, in Tempo, every functionality lives in a separate interface and plugin, and yes, you have to pay for each. Timesheets for time tracking, Planner for resource scheduling, Financials for budget tracking… it adds up quickly. By the way, this is one of the most common reasons users start looking for Tempo alternatives, according to reviews:

“What we use quite extensively are Tempo add-ons, specifically Structure, Timesheet, and Capacity planner. The problem is that if we pay for all the add-ons on Jira cloud as well, the cost will increase significantly. What we are considering now is finding equivalents for these add-ons inside the native capabilities of the Jira premium version.” — Tempo user on Reddit.

Anyway, let’s dig deeper into the comparison.

Tempo Timesheets

Tempo Timesheets is the first and most popular app developed in the Tempo Empire, currently used by thousands of users. Since time tracking is the backbone of Tempo, all other Tempo plugins are designed to build on it and enhance its functionality within their own ecosystem.

As a time tracking plugin, Tempo Timesheets allows you to:

• Track time directly in Jira work items
• Log time in the list view, calendar view, or timesheet
• Connect Google or Office 365 calendars to log time in external events
• Use a timer or manual time tracking input
• Tag billable hours / non-billable hours
• Approve timesheets
• Report for teams, projects, or clients
• Create work logs on the go with the mobile app
• Log time by simply asking Rovo, Atlassian’s AI agent (“Log two hours on PROJ-123”)

Looks solid at first glance. 

But there’s the rub: Tempo is not the kind of tool you install on your Jira instance and instantly get perfect reports from. Billing rates, permissions, report views, and worklog rules all need to be set up properly, so teams should expect a bit of admin overhead upfront.

Pros of Tempo Timesheets for time tracking:

• Timesheet approval workflow and team-level reporting are highly valuable for big enterprises.
• Wide integration capabilities: external calendars eliminate the issue of tracking meetings and other non-Jira events.
• Focus on client invoicing (in combination with the Financial Manager plugin).
• Tempo is a more reputable player on the market, so some big companies simply feel safer with it.

Cons of Tempo Timesheets for time tracking:

• The price is high compared to competitors, with fees ranging from $0.25 to $5.21 per user. For context, most time trackers are usually priced between $0.01 and $0.08 per user. Plus, there is no free version for small teams, only a 30-day trial. And Tempo raised its Cloud list prices again on September 15, 2026 (Timesheets by roughly 13–15%).
• You might end up needing to buy additional plugins to see the full picture, e.g., Tempo Planner to link tracked time against planned, or Financial Manager for deeper cost tracking and financial tracking.
• Teams that just want to log time and easily export it, Tempo Timesheet can feel like overkill due to its complexity and broad feature set.

Planyway as a Tempo Timesheets alternative

Planyway for Jira is a full-fledged resource management and project planning tool that gives teams everything they need to plan and track across projects. It means that Planyway comes as a single package deal, bringing roadmapping, resource capacity planning, portfolio, calendar, time tracking, and customized reports under one roof. This means you don't have to purchase a time tracking tool as a separate plugin — Planyway covers it all in one app under one price.

Here are the main time tracking features that our users love in Planyway:

• Timer or manual time logging (everything syncs with Jira worklogs)
• Logging time right inside the Jira work item or in one of the dedicated views (list, calendar view, or timesheet — whatever suits you and your team)
• Tracking billable and non-billable time, with filters to separate client work from internal time
• Reporting — timesheets, tracked vs planned, tracked time, costs & revenue reports.
• Exporting data in Excel or CSV with filters applied — or via a link.
• Seamless integration with resource planning and roadmaps in the same app, for one price

“Planyway combines roadmapping, resource planning, and time tracking in a single app, making it a fantastic value for teams looking for seamless project planning. For a price lower than some other tools that only cover a single use case.” — Planyway user on Atlassian Marketplace.

Pros of Planyway for time tracking:

• Free for up to 10 users, then a per-user rate that gets lower as the team grows. Time tracking, resource planning and roadmaps are all in that one price.
• Time entries link directly to tasks and projects, so you can see exactly how tracked hours affect resource allocation.
• Multiple intuitive ways to log time, which makes it easy and seamless for the team.
• Logging right where the work happens makes for more accurate time tracking.
• Reports keep all applied filters when exporting to Excel or CSV.

Cons of Planyway for time tracking:

• Cost management is lighter than in Tempo: there’s a Costs & Revenue report, but it’s not a full financial tool like Financial Manager.

#2 Resource planning and scheduling

Since Tempo Timesheets doesn’t answer resource questions, most teams end up buying Tempo Capacity Planner on top of their existing Tempo Timesheets to fill in the resource management gap. Tempo Timesheets tracks actual hours worked, while Tempo Capacity Planner helps managers plan tasks, allocate resources, and visualize team capacity. Together, they cover the full workflow.

Tempo Capacity Planner

Tempo Capacity Planner is billed as a tool for advanced resource planning, offering detailed insights and forecasting options to support large teams and complex projects. If you compare it to other similar plugins, it stands out for its in-depth focus on matching resources to tasks based on their skills and roles, which guarantees that the right people are assigned to the right work.

In Tempo Planner, you can:

• Visualize the user’s capacity for work
• Assign team roles and skills
• Decide who can only view plans, manage, or approve
• Plan vacations, holidays, or medical leaves
• Connect Google or Outlook 365 calendars to view full availability
• Book temporary resources (potential hires, etc.)
• Create a planned vs actual report (in combination with Tempo Timesheets)

Pros of Tempo Planner

• It has support for various organizational structures and use cases.
• Clear color-coding helps quickly identify workload imbalances.
• Resource planning takes skills and roles into account.
• It seamlessly integrates with Timesheets and Financial Manager for deep analysis.

Cons of Tempo Planner

• You need to recreate Jira teams in Tempo to plan them out.
• Tracking how the original plan stacks up against real time spent is only possible with another plugin — Tempo Timesheet.
• Users mention performance and UI issues (UI can feel heavy or slow with larger organizations).
• It focuses more on formal resource performance rather than on the real work execution, so it can be hard to align with the actual delivery plan.
• Its Cloud price went up by about 10% in September 2026, on top of the Timesheets fee.

Planyway as a Tempo Planner alternative

As Planyway acts as a single app, it explicitly incorporates resource planning into the whole planning process. You can’t set a deadline if you don’t know who is available, right?

So, in Planyway, you don't just dump tasks into a sprint; you distribute them across your team's actual capacity, seamlessly switching from your project plan to resource map and back to see if it fits. This is what creates a truly working resource plan, not just a detached picture of assignments.

With Planyway, you can:

• See everything each person has across all your Jira projects on one timeline, spot overloads with utilization bars and over-capacity alerts, and compare scheduled time against capacity (plus utilization) in the Workload Report.
• Rebalance in a drag: move or stretch work items, or split them between several assignees and track each part separately.
• Plan around your team: vacations, sick leave, regional holidays, working hours and part-time schedules.
• Shift dependent work automatically when plans change.
• Compare planned vs tracked time, and share a link or a PDF with stakeholders
• Let our Rovo-based Risk Agent flag where capacity may fall short

Pros of Planyway workload view:

• Project plans, resource capacity planning and timesheets in one app, for one price.
• Two-way sync with Jira: dates, estimates and tracked time stay in step.
• Capacity follows how your team really works: working hours, part-time schedules, time off and regional holidays adjust it automatically.
• One flow from team capacity to each person's workload, down to individual work items, with reports ready to share with stakeholders. 

Cons of Planyway: 

• Works with Jira assignments only, so external calendar events aren't taken into account.
• No dedicated skill or role management yet.

“Finally, I ended up with Planyway, and now it seems exactly what I was looking for. Smooth transition from the project plan to work distribution. Love being able to set different capacities and highlight vacations. It’s clean, transparent, and the UI is super easy.” — Planyway user on Atlassian Marketplace.

#3 Reporting and analytics

The real challenge is not logging time in Jira — it is turning time entries into reports you can trust. Time reports should give you numbers you can actually use in team reviews, stakeholder updates, and client reporting without wasting hours on Excel spreadsheets.

Tempo ecosystem

We won’t beat around the bush: Tempo really excels at reporting, going in depth on billing and costs.

It doesn’t stop at aggregating time logs — it turns them into actionable business insights. Whether you're focused on billing, tracking compliance, or forecasting resource utilization, it gives you clearly structured data to drive the right decisions.

However, users often have to use a combination of several Tempo plugins to achieve that.

Here is what Tempo has to offer:

• Logged time report (Tempo Timesheets)
• Planned time report (Tempo Capacity Planner)
• Planned vs actual report (Tempo Timesheets+Tempo Capacity Planner)
• Cost & revenues (Tempo Timesheets+Tempo Financial Manager)
• Team member capacity report (Tempo Capacity Planner)

“I'm very encouraged by the initial functionality of Tempo Financial Manager. The report creator's intuitive design allows for quick generation of essential financial overviews, which is a significant time-saver.” — Tempo user on Atlassian Marketplace.

Pros:

• Tempo plugins generate a wide variety of reports, from a simple logged time report to a cost-effectiveness analysis.
• Tempo allows for easy client billing based on actual hours worked and billing rates.
• Here, users can calculate costs and revenues to understand the financial health of their projects.
• Users can separate capital (CAPEX) and operational (OPEX) expenses for accurate accounting and comprehensive reporting.
• Users can forecast potential resource shortages or over-allocation.
• Tempo plugins allow saving report templates to reuse them in the future.

Cons:

• Different types of reports live in different plugins.
• Permissions have to be properly managed across different teams and projects, which can be time-consuming and error-prone, especially in large enterprises.
• Some configurations need to be set up multiple times in different places.

Planyway

Reports in Planyway build themselves: plan and log time as usual, and the numbers flow into ready-to-share reports on tracked time, plan vs actual, workload, and costs and revenue. They show the team whether it's on course and whether the plan holds up. 

What you get in Planyway in terms of reporting:

• Tracked time report (multiple filters and configurations)
• Planned vs tracked time report
• Detailed timesheet
• Costs & Revenue report
• Workload report (capacity vs scheduled work)
• Billable vs non-billable hours split
• Export to PDF, Excel or CSV — or sharing via a link for Jira users

Pros:

• Planyway works as a feedback loop: plan → execution → improvement.
• The plugin helps users highlight project health and risks by comparing actual time tracked against estimates.
• Planyway allows users to leverage pre-built templates and to apply filters without configuring each report from scratch.

Cons:

• Financial reporting is lighter than Tempo’s Financial Manager
• Not built for full billing and invoicing

#4 Ease of use and UX

Jira is complex enough, so spending a bajillion hours on finding their way around plugins is the last thing users want. Plus, the simpler and more user-friendly the interface is, the faster the team can adapt, and the fewer mistakes and misunderstandings happen.

Tempo

Both Tempo Timesheets and Tempo Capacity Planner pack a lot of advanced features, which make them both powerful and complex. The interface of both plugins might feel confusing, especially in the beginning, when it’s not always clear how to move between key features. Detailed permissions and configurations add more flexibility, but also add to the learning curve.

There’s a fine line between tool complexity and user accessibility, and many feel that Tempo could do more to make the interface simpler and more intuitive for users.

“The process works, but I feel like it is not smooth from a UX perspective. Navigating between team members to approve their timesheets and then back to the team members list bounces me back to the current week without remembering where I was before, overall adding to the frustration of using this tool. As our team grows I feel like it may become even more frustrating to use. On the bright side, Tempo appears to be adding features all the time, so maybe a rework of the overall navigation is already in the works.” — Tempo user on Atlassian Marketplace.

Planyway

The Planyway team’s motto is to make work visually intuitive. Our team actively collects user insights from support tickets, customer interviews, and surveys to use them to refine our design. Unlike other plugins, we aim for a minimalist, intuitive interface so that users can quickly access what they need without feeling overwhelmed by excessive features. The result is a minimal learning curve for new teammates.

“The design is clean, user-friendly, making it a joy to use every day. One of my favorite key features is the drag-and-drop, which not only moves tasks around but also adjusts the task duration based on the estimation. It’s such a time-saver!” — Planyway user on Atlassian Marketplace.

Final comparison of Planyway vs Tempo Timesheets vs Tempo Planner

Now, let’s sum up what each tool does best and where they differ:

Farewell

When searching for Tempo Timesheets alternatives or a replacement for Tempo Capacity Planner, think of your specific needs, rather than getting caught up in a long list of features.

If you are looking for an intuitive tool to gain visual clarity of what’s going on in your complex projects, what your team is doing, and if you are delivering on time without the hassle of multiple plugins and high costs — Planyway is the clear winner.

If your business goals, financial metrics, and budget management come first, then Tempo Timesheets, in combination with Tempo Planner, are your best friends.